MLeake,
The article has examples of that.
I did read it, AND just say, I grant it is rare.
However... for the umpteenth time...
The RISK/BENEFIT ratio doesn't warrant it.
In other words... there's no reason to have it... we have hearing protection that doesn't have insidious uses, so why allow those with insidious purposes?
And, so, your point of why it is OK to attack me, which at least you admit there is attacking going on here... it's not only ridiculous to suggest that's ok... but it's also incorrect, because I did back up what I said.
I'm also still waiting for your magic number of how many crimes it takes before it matters? Or did you give up that ludicrous line of questioning?
|