The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

**Mike Irwin** · October 30, 2012, 09:02 PM

OK, I didn't follow that we had switched over to discussing the few, but known, revolvers that were marked 29-58.

That's not what Mr. Gumm described, or at least he made no reference to it being marked 29-58, which is why I answered as I did.

As I said, numerous people over the years have claimed to have revolvers marked 58 that were specifically manufactured by S&W in .44 Mag., but without the 29- marking.

I've yet to see one.

October 30, 2012, 09:02 PM	#33
Mike Irwin Staff Join Date: April 13, 2000 Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 41,380	OK, I didn't follow that we had switched over to discussing the few, but known, revolvers that were marked 29-58. That's not what Mr. Gumm described, or at least he made no reference to it being marked 29-58, which is why I answered as I did. As I said, numerous people over the years have claimed to have revolvers marked 58 that were specifically manufactured by S&W in .44 Mag., but without the 29- marking. I've yet to see one. __________________ "The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.