View Single Post
Old January 11, 2013, 10:33 PM   #86
dorc-1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 17, 2012
Posts: 106
Leaving things the way they are is just fine with most responders, and you will have a bigger hill to climb in the next mass shooting. When no compromise exists then it's just a matter of time before a police state edict is written for confiscation and separate factions take up arms against each other. For those of you that welcome this kind of existence then you and those who believe that way can stand together as civil war ensues.

Felony responsibility assumption for those relatives that wish to remove a reported relative from purchasing guns doesn't have to reflect a charge based solely on using that gun in any felony. It can be adjusted to only include if the gun is used with intent to commit mass casualties on non family members. This will give some wiggle room for those relatives that would feel uncomfortable signing off on behalf of those removed.

Yeah, yeah, I know........no compromise. Good Luck.
dorc-1 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03588 seconds with 8 queries