View Single Post
Old March 1, 2013, 11:33 AM   #8
Frank Ettin
Staff
 
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
This could become a messy situation. There is a significant, potentially complicating factor.

It is my understanding that for the purposes of federal law because an AR lower receiver may be built out into either a rifle or a handgun, it is neither a rifle nor a handgun; and it is therefore classed as "other." And under federal law it would be subject to rules generally applicable to handguns (unless and until it is actually built into a rifle).

I have no idea how an AR lower would be treated under Connecticut law. So there is a possibility that the initial transfer without formalities to the OP was infirm under Connecticut law.

So getting a lawyer involved might be a very good idea. Also, documenting any contacted or attempted contact is good idea.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wooly booger
...If you lived together in CT and depending how long) the lower could be considered communtiy property...
You should not he spouting off law that you don't understand. Community property is a particular form of marital property law based on Civil (Roman) Law and recognized in nine States: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. Connecticut is not a community property State; marital property law in Connecticut (and the other States) is based on Common Law.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper
Frank Ettin is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02265 seconds with 8 queries