The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

lake393 · February 14, 2014, 05:18 PM

For anyone who doesn't have time to trudge through all 127 pages, read this article, which came out today: Ninth Circuit Peruta ruling reveals faults with other circuit opinions

It analyses yesterday's 9th Circuit CoA victory in Peruta v. San Diego, in which Judge O’Scannlain's ruling and 127-pg majority opinion contradicted and flat-out shamed three previous CoA rulings (Drake in CoA 2, Wollard in CoA 3, & Kachalsky in CoA 4), and really thew down the gauntlet for the SCOTUS to take-up Drake v. Jerejian.

Good news methinks.

EDIT: Correction from Al Norris:
Kachalsky was CA2; Woollard was CA4; and Drake is CA3

February 14, 2014, 05:18 PM	#91
lake393 Junior Member Join Date: November 10, 2013 Posts: 6	For anyone who doesn't have time to trudge through all 127 pages, read this article, which came out today: Ninth Circuit Peruta ruling reveals faults with other circuit opinions It analyses yesterday's 9th Circuit CoA victory in Peruta v. San Diego, in which Judge O’Scannlain's ruling and 127-pg majority opinion contradicted and flat-out shamed three previous CoA rulings (Drake in CoA 2, Wollard in CoA 3, & Kachalsky in CoA 4), and really thew down the gauntlet for the SCOTUS to take-up Drake v. Jerejian. Good news methinks. EDIT: Correction from Al Norris: Kachalsky was CA2; Woollard was CA4; and Drake is CA3 Last edited by lake393; February 15, 2014 at 12:30 AM.