|
Even if the lady was prohibited rightly at the worst it would require taking the guns but legally the option of securing them should have been open to them as written in the CA publication I noted.
All things we don't know.
Was the issue with the guns communicated to the patient as is required in that same article?
Was that securing the guns option communicated to the patient so they could secure the guns before the lady was released?
Was she and her husband told nothing and until the raid happened knew nothing?
If that last question is what happened I'd say a lot of failures took place by the facility and the state and these people had the hell violated out of their rights.
Somehow I don't think the facility or the state will be very forthcoming with answers to questions like that..........It will be like pulling teeth.
Or like getting info about fast and furious.....
|