View Single Post
Old June 22, 2012, 10:22 AM   #7
Luger_carbine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 18, 2012
Posts: 389
One slightly dissapointing thing...

Quote:
“There is something incongruent about a nonviolent person, who is not a felon but who is convicted of a misdemeanor offense of simple possession of a firearm, being forever barred from exercising his constitutional right to defend himself in his own home in Chicago against felons or violent criminals,” Der-Yeghiayan said.
I wish he would have left "In the Home" out his remarks, it seems to reference the erroneous "in the home" principle that the lower courts have been promulgating.
Luger_carbine is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02832 seconds with 8 queries