View Single Post
Old March 19, 2012, 08:22 PM   #4
cslinger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,045
Gen 2 .40 calibers have the rep of having really unsupported chambers which makes them more prone to the dreaded KB (still not likely a HUGE issue). I believe they addressed the chamber in the GEN 3s.

Early Glock 36s had teething problems, feed issues.

There was a run within some serial range where frames or the steel inserts or something to that effect were cracking.

Pre Gen 4 Glock 22s were hit or miss when tac lights were attached which lead to the heavier springs in the Gen 4s.

I think very early Glock 19s had some teething issues.

Something about the 10mm Glocks ripping holes in space time.

The afore mentioned Gen 4 9mm issues.

I think early NFML magazines would crack or buldge.

Sometime in the early 80s somebody mixed a whole lot of ugly in accidentally and that hasn't seemed to run its course yet.

All in all they are all pretty darn good out of the box. Most of the issues have been worked out and Glock seems to be one of the most consistent in terms of quality control out there.
__________________
"Is there anyway I can write my local gun store off on my taxes as dependents?"
cslinger is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04467 seconds with 8 queries