View Single Post
Old January 5, 2010, 09:34 PM   #6
vranasaurus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 16, 2008
Posts: 1,184
I would think laws that permanently deprive misdemeanents of their RKBA will be challenged.

Any crime that causes one to permanently lose a civil right ought to be a felony.

Some states deprive certain misdemeanents of the RKBA for a certain number of years. Will this be OK?

Should non-violent felons be treated the same as vioent felons? The GCA 68 makes an exception for felons who committ certain white collar crimes does this go far enough?

If you let Felons vote do you have to let them own guns, serve on juries etc... Or can the state pick and choose which rights to restore and which not to?

If the state where you were convicted allows you to own guns by restoration or otherwise will other states have to recognize that?
vranasaurus is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03209 seconds with 8 queries