The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - Charles Nichols v. Edmund G Brown Jr et al

Charles Nichols · April 25, 2012, 08:36 PM

Forty-two years of California court decisions have held that businesses can not prevent persons from engaging in constitutionally protected activities on commercial property so long as they do not actively interfere with the operations of the business.

The only two exceptions are at isolated stand-alone businesses which can prohibit signature gathering and inside of airports which can prohibit receiving cash or cheques (but not prohibit asking that cash or cheques be mailed to them).

April 25, 2012, 08:36 PM	#12
Charles Nichols Junior member Join Date: April 23, 2012 Posts: 20	Forty-two years of California court decisions have held that businesses can not prevent persons from engaging in constitutionally protected activities on commercial property so long as they do not actively interfere with the operations of the business. The only two exceptions are at isolated stand-alone businesses which can prohibit signature gathering and inside of airports which can prohibit receiving cash or cheques (but not prohibit asking that cash or cheques be mailed to them). Last edited by Frank Ettin; April 25, 2012 at 08:46 PM. Reason: delete defamatory content