The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

Hook686 · August 24, 2012, 04:03 PM

My opinion was the article used relatively similar loads for testing. I noticed the .357 magnum losads were not the top pick available. .44 Special and .44 magnum were also lacking. I concluded the test was mostly geared toward those that use the typical service round catagory and to help them perhaps pick a round for their handgun. General data with an attempt to be able to compare apples to apples. I found it interesting. Perhaps because I do not use any of the loadings tested.

August 24, 2012, 04:03 PM	#10
Hook686 Senior Member Join Date: May 22, 2005 Location: USA The Great State of California Posts: 2,090	My opinion was the article used relatively similar loads for testing. I noticed the .357 magnum losads were not the top pick available. .44 Special and .44 magnum were also lacking. I concluded the test was mostly geared toward those that use the typical service round catagory and to help them perhaps pick a round for their handgun. General data with an attempt to be able to compare apples to apples. I found it interesting. Perhaps because I do not use any of the loadings tested. __________________ Hook686 When the number of people in institutions reaches 51%, we change sides.