View Single Post
Old October 4, 2010, 07:22 AM   #9
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
"I condemn his recklessly sending rounds across the street into a house where innocents could have been hurt or killed...."


I don't. The homeowner did nothing wrong. He was attacked and defended himself. The gangster is 100% responsible for any stray rounds or resulting casualties.

I refuse to blame the innocent for the crimes of the guilty. Nor, do I believe in "apportioning" fault when one man is clearly an aggressive criminal and the other is merely defending himself. The criminal is 100% responsible. We really should not forget that.
Skans is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02719 seconds with 8 queries