|
Not to forget the insurance industry mandating the signs to keep them from being sued. That's the major point of them - liability.
It's not our laws restricting our rights as much as our employers and the insurers disarming us on their property. And the Constitutional arguments are difficult to assess.
You have every right to keep others off your property if they are bearing arms and you don't want them to. Farmers and ranchers deal with this all the time. Even their neighbors can be a nuisance.
If they can post no hunting, the mall can post no guns. It's respecting their property rights, too.
Unless we strip commercial property owners of their rights, just to enforce our safety. That is going to be a long running debate, it's been going on for decades already.
|