OK, so far 84 posts on this, and what do we have?
He was justified.
No he wasn't.
Wuz too!
Wuz not!
Closed until either A. New solid
FACTS are revealed on the incident, or B. we want to discuss the overall incident from a tactical or training standpoint, (minus the "wus-not!-wuz-too!'s"
)
Feel free to start Pt. II if either A or B applies.