View Single Post
Old June 11, 2013, 02:23 AM   #24
dakota.potts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
" Actually, if I understand it right, they do leave the sound of gunshots unedited. That's because they don't use them at all. They can't. At least not with analog tape. I don't know about digital tech, but with film/video tape, the sound of a gunshot maxes out the media (pegs the meters), and comes across as a loud pop, no matter the caliber. .22s are smaller pops, but they are all pops, sounding nothing like a real gunshot. "

I do sound effects at an amateur level for video games.

Very often they do use sounds from real guns. Take for instance, Battlefield 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYXqXm_LLHg

This video compares two big video games, Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3. I find Battlefield (the 1st and every alternating video) to sound much more like what I hear at the range. Modern Warfare gun sounds are incredibly dull and bassy. I guess that's what happens when you fire so many guns without hearing protection though You lose the high end of your hearing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc8WQsIxhro here's a great (fairly short) video from the sound designer of Battlefield 3. He talks about why they exaggerate sounds and their process. There's footage of them in the middle of a military "war game" with tanks, blank rounds, jets, the whole shebang and then getting source audio from there to analyze it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkxuPX5l7zM

I'm sure there are some big name films that use terrible sound effects but we (sound designers) are not all like that!

EDIT: My original point is that today with our microphones with high SPL tolerances, compressors/limiters, and control over input signal, you'd be surprised what you can record with a $100 mic and a computer.

Last edited by dakota.potts; June 11, 2013 at 02:30 AM.
dakota.potts is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02334 seconds with 8 queries