View Single Post
Old October 25, 2013, 08:37 PM   #12
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
I sold several of the "Kimber rebuilds" while they were being produced. My recollection is that those were built using late production Swedish 96 type actions, NOT 93/95 actions.
I'll add this as FYI.
The fact that some governments rebarrelled, rebored, or rechambered certain types of military bolt actions does not mean that those conversions were/are safe or prudent. Some were quite safe and effective but ALL were expedient solutions during time of need. If 5000 rifles were converted and 5% failed in the hands of a soldier, that was likely acceptable. In addition, many of those conversions were only meant to provide a temporary solution-not last forever.
Personally, I'd prefer a little more safety margin. I own 3-4 of the 1916 Mausers in 7.62x51 and a couple that have been rebarrelled but don't use commercial ammo in them. Only handloads at a safe pressure level go in those rifles.

Last edited by Mobuck; October 26, 2013 at 06:29 AM.
Mobuck is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.06178 seconds with 8 queries