Quote:
|
I do not see cites and posts. I say show me posts, cites, and news stories about a CLEAN homeowner who shoots and kills a burglar.
|
Why is it that you think that how "clean" a homeowner might be will impinge on the situation? Do you somehow think that that factor will influence justifiability?
Quote:
|
Post the links to the washington case, I don't believe it will pass muster.
|
No, I won't
take the time, and frankly, I do not care what you believe.
I have told you all that I know: a man came home to find a man in his house, shot him, and was charged with murder.
If a citizen employs deadly force within his dwelling, domicile, etc.
and is justified under the law, one would hope that he will not be charged; in castle law states he stands a good chance; if he shoots someone under questionable circumstances and there is unfavorable evidence, he may well be charged, and he probably deserves it.
How "clean" he is is
completely irrelevant.
Read this for a better understanding. I't too long to paste, but you will learn that seedy characters may be sucessfully defended in court:
http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/01c1...ocument&Click=