Quote:
It doesn't take a lot of imagination to foresee a punitive tax on gun ownership or public speaking. Under the Roberts' rationale, since those taxes prohibit no speech or ownership, and congress has taxing authority, would those taxes be upheld?
|
I think the examples of gun ownership and public speaking get to the heart of the matter. Congress clearly has the power to tax, essentially without any specific limits. However, when that power of the government conflicts with a constitutional right (RKBA or speech), longstanding legal precedent holds that a right limits a power.
I see the ObamaCare decision much like Kelo - repugnant, but technically correct. Like Kelo, the ObamaCare decision should be a strong message from the judicial system that the courts cannot (and should not) fix everything and that the citizens must exercise control over the legislative branch.