View Single Post
Old July 5, 2012, 08:19 AM   #11
NJgunowner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,254
I don't like it, but I understand it.

In the case of health insurance, people who don't have any cost the government millions, if not billions. The REASONING makes sense, we'll have to wait and see if it works in practice though. They are basically passing that cost on to the no insurance crowd making them pay their share of the costs. As someone who has had his own health insurance since I was 22, I have no problem with this. At least now the insurance can't put a limit on how much they'll cover if I ever have a major ongoing problem.

I think this is a non-issue as far as gun ownership. I'd be more worried that insurance companies will charge more to cover gun owners, similar to how some life insurance companies charge scuba divers more. (claiming higher risk and therefore liability)

Last edited by NJgunowner; July 5, 2012 at 08:31 AM.
NJgunowner is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03283 seconds with 8 queries