The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - Do you think our forefathers had current guns in mind when writing the 2nd Amendment?

SPEMack618 · January 6, 2013, 02:57 PM

There is a picture floating around, GoogleImage would be a good start, of a Korea shopowner, or possibly friend, brother, husband, whatever of a shopower standing atop a store during the Rodney King riots packing a Mini-14.

Not an AR-15, but still a magazine fed semi-automatic .223 caliber carbine.

AHA! Found it.

http://askakorean.blogspot.com/2011/...ran-story.html

A Mini-14, a Mossberg riot gun, and some sort of black rifle.

The argument for a high capacity magazine becomes a lot clearer when you look at a mob of miscreants instead of one guy with pantyhose on his head.

January 6, 2013, 02:57 PM	#177
SPEMack618 Senior Member Join Date: June 21, 2010 Location: Central Georgia Posts: 1,863	There is a picture floating around, GoogleImage would be a good start, of a Korea shopowner, or possibly friend, brother, husband, whatever of a shopower standing atop a store during the Rodney King riots packing a Mini-14. Not an AR-15, but still a magazine fed semi-automatic .223 caliber carbine. AHA! Found it. http://askakorean.blogspot.com/2011/...ran-story.html A Mini-14, a Mossberg riot gun, and some sort of black rifle. The argument for a high capacity magazine becomes a lot clearer when you look at a mob of miscreants instead of one guy with pantyhose on his head. __________________ NRA Life Member Read my blog! "The answer to any caliber debate is going to be .38 Super, 10mm, .357 Sig or .41 Magnum!" Last edited by SPEMack618; January 6, 2013 at 03:00 PM. Reason: Found picture.