View Single Post
Old December 31, 2011, 11:16 AM   #21
Al Norris
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
The findings of fact (the various discrepancies in billing) probably can not be challenged. The judges discretionary actions in not applying any Loadstar enhancements are what may be appealed.

There is nothing ordinary about this case. It is a case that will be cited for the next 100 years. It took an amazing amount of determination and extraordinary litigation skill to bring this case to its victory.

It says something about these 6 attorneys that stuck to litigation when the defendants were going through attorneys like sand through a sieve. <-- This may not be an arguable point, yet it instructs us that nothing about this case was ordinary.

Also, consider what this determination will do for Gura's fees in the Chicago case.

I'm sure all of this is going through Alan Gura's mind, as he digests this order.
Al Norris is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03267 seconds with 8 queries