View Single Post
Old February 16, 2009, 02:52 AM   #20
teeroux
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2006
Posts: 1,512
Quote:
Those against it usually claim that the collateral damage that can be caused by the full auto rate of fire is not appropriate for a civilian zone, but rather for a free fire war zone where area suppression is needed.

There are plenty of good arguments for both sides, but unfortunately I must admit that the collateral damage theory makes a good deal of sense to most everybody, myself included.
Well since police and federal agencies already field FA weapons in the civillan zones it sort of makes collateral damage in civillan zones a double standard now doesn't it.
teeroux is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02741 seconds with 8 queries