The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

firewrench044 · April 21, 2012, 02:26 PM

have used both-

digital is easier to read (fewer mistakes) but too many bad readings
bad batteries, cheaply made, worn out way too soon causing inconsistant readings
too many *** is going on heres

I went back to dial, even the cheaper ones give a consitant reading

I load for accuracy and when a bullet shoots best between 10 and 15 thou. off lands that is where I want it, with a case trimed to where I wanted it to be trimed

April 21, 2012, 02:26 PM	#21
firewrench044 Senior Member Join Date: July 9, 2007 Location: Fort Pierce, Florida Posts: 381	have used both- digital is easier to read (fewer mistakes) but too many bad readings bad batteries, cheaply made, worn out way too soon causing inconsistant readings too many *** is going on heres I went back to dial, even the cheaper ones give a consitant reading I load for accuracy and when a bullet shoots best between 10 and 15 thou. off lands that is where I want it, with a case trimed to where I wanted it to be trimed