View Single Post
Old March 8, 2014, 10:56 PM   #68
Jim March
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
Quote:
Well, the March 6th deadline came and went without any judges on the 9th Circuit requesting en banc review.
Cool!

Quote:
The Yolo County sheriff's department has until the 19th if they want to ask for review.
Legally, sure, but the reality is, if we weren't going to get support from ONE judge for an en banc review of Peruta, we aren't going to see a voting majority for Richards.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying "the tea leaves appear to say no way Jose".

Quote:
Beyond that, only Ms. Harris' motion can trigger it.
Well only if the three-judge panel that decided Peruta and Richards agrees. We'll get genetically modified aerodynamic pork before that happens.

Harris was really trying to get one of the 9th Circuit judges to put Peruta into en banc status. We now know that failed.

Oh heck yeah. We're going to see Peruta stand and take effect, preserving the huge gaping 12ga-sized blast hole of a circuit split in time for the Supremes to decide on Drake.

Dominos are falling just like we need 'em to here.
__________________
Jim March
Jim March is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04486 seconds with 8 queries