Double Naught Spy,
I'm sorry but I fail to see the relevance of your last post? How does marines concluding that they are taking from a sniper and another marine missing with a rocket have anything to do with being trained to engage longer shots or the use of automatic fire?
Old Smoker made the statement that (I'm paraphrasing) the current military does not train proper long distance shooting and are taught to go full auto and hope for a hit. I commented that is not true and that ground forces do train in marksmanship and rarely even train to use auto or burst on their rifles but it is nice to have the option. You post something about how marines act under fire and miss with a rocket and that brings doubts of rifle marksmanship how?
With all due respect but I find your last post completely irrelevant without further explanation.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spats McGee
If my home is ever raided by the police, I'll be sorely disappointed if the term "arsenal" doesn't show up in the newspaper.
|
|