The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

joe45c · April 2, 2012, 10:41 AM

also i think the 11-87 was supposed to handle a better range of loads, from field 2-3/4 to 3'mags, but since i have never owened one i don't know if they could do it or not. i think if i remember right they had problems cycling lighter loads.

April 2, 2012, 10:41 AM	#3
joe45c Senior Member Join Date: January 22, 2012 Location: peru ny Posts: 218	also i think the 11-87 was supposed to handle a better range of loads, from field 2-3/4 to 3'mags, but since i have never owened one i don't know if they could do it or not. i think if i remember right they had problems cycling lighter loads.