Quote:
"...you don't rely on your sights..." Rubbish. Aimed fire is always better. Both legally and morally.
|
Yes. However, aimed fired (using the sights) is not always possible. Thus the importance of being able to utilize threat focused shooting.
Quote:
If you don't use the sights and one bullet hits something or somebody, you're liable.
|
Whether you use the sights or not really doesn't effect the liability issue much. If you use the sights and hit something you shouldn't, you're not any more or less liable than if you used the threat focused shooting. If you don't use the sights and you hit your target, you aren't any more or less liable than if you used the sights.