View Single Post
Old September 21, 2007, 06:05 PM   #18
BluesBear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Location: Mill Creek, Washington (The Great Pacific NorthWet)
Posts: 378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Keenan
Browning never seemed to favor manual safety devices on guns with hammers, evidently feeling that the half-cock and/or an inertia firing pin provided a perfectly adequate safety for carrying a loaded gun.
EXACTLY!!!

If you look at all of the pistols that Browning designed for Colt, all of the pistols that featured an internal hammer (or striker) had both a manual safety AND a grip safety.
While the pistols with an exposed hammer had no manual safeties at all.
Until a grip safety appeared, in 1907, on the experimental pistols being developed for the military trials, at the request of the Army.
It wasn't until 1911 that a production Colt pistol had both an exposed hammer and a manual safety.

And the magazine disconnect "safety" that appeared in 1916 on the 1908 .25ACP and in 1926 on the 1903 .32 ACP & 1908 .380 ACP was entirely Colt's idea. They were not part of Browning's original design.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΈ, Y'all

The "Fashion Calibers" seem to come and go but when all is said and done everybody comes back to the forty-five.
(Chris Curino - Kimber Mfg. Co.)

__________________
BluesBear is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02572 seconds with 8 queries