The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

MattShlock · October 1, 2013, 06:25 PM

That's what you're hanging your hat on mavracer? That the fewer, slower, pellets with less energy overall have four percent (4%!) more "momentum" each? Seriously!?

Please stop misdirecting people to immaterial facts and selectively ignoring others to make an obviously nonsensical point. Each of the 10% fewer , slower, pellets admittedly also have two percent (only 2%!) more energy each but offer more resistance to deeper penetration having seventeen percent (17%!) more surface area.

In other words, to be clear, the 3" 20 Gauge #2 Buckshot shells ain't buyin' us nothin' over standard Remington 2-3/4" #3 Buckshot rounds, I think ya know it, and now you're kinda trolling here.

Maybe we need to shut such intentional misguidance down on this forum now as well...

October 1, 2013, 06:25 PM	#15
MattShlock Senior Member Join Date: April 8, 2013 Posts: 251	That's what you're hanging your hat on mavracer? That the fewer, slower, pellets with less energy overall have four percent (4%!) more "momentum" each? Seriously!? Please stop misdirecting people to immaterial facts and selectively ignoring others to make an obviously nonsensical point. Each of the 10% fewer , slower, pellets admittedly also have two percent (only 2%!) more energy each but offer more resistance to deeper penetration having seventeen percent (17%!) more surface area. In other words, to be clear, *the 3" 20 Gauge #2 Buckshot shells ain't buyin' us nothin'* over standard Remington 2-3/4" #3 Buckshot rounds*, I think ya know it, and now you're kinda trolling here. Maybe we need to shut such intentional misguidance down on this* forum now as well... Last edited by MattShlock; October 1, 2013 at 06:38 PM.