View Single Post
Old February 27, 2009, 11:12 AM   #19
the_pragmaticist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 29, 2008
Posts: 201
It angries up my blood to see the judge make this statement:

"There being no law whatsoever dealing with the issue of an unconcealed weapon or the so-called open carry is why we're here today," Murphy said.


SINCE BLOODY WHEN does there have to be laws to LET us do things? Forgive me, I always had the impression that we had to break an existing law in order to be pulled in front of a judge and threatened with incarceration. I had always considered the police to be law enforcers, not moral arbitors with a duty to come up with laws that could possibly exist and therefore may have been preemptively violated.
the_pragmaticist is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02156 seconds with 8 queries