Dont know if this is relevant to this thread but here in SD just today a bill left
committee to allow deadly force w/o requirement to retreat if you feel life is in danger.I believe it has always been generally accepted here that deadly force is justified in those situations its simply being codified so some overzealous States Attorney can't charge a civilian for a justified shooting.Bought Time!As far as the scenario described I believe a cautious retreat would be the best option,being disabled though I wouldnt be able to retreat far at which point more forceful persuasion would be required.
