Was this attack random, based on the victim being alone, or was it aimed at someone who had just won a lot of money?
Anyways,
if I had been there and was armed with a pistol, I
may have fired off a couple of rounds in the air ONLY once the 'victim' fell down. At that point, he's obviously defenseless, and I'd be justified in intervening.
(If he's still standing, then he might get away on his own, or the crowd might disperse.)
But that doesn't mean I'd hang around either. I'm getting the hell away from there, because I wouldn't trust the law to not turn against me, even if what I did was right.
If I didn't have a gun, then I'm not going to risk getting myself killed. Instead, I'd go to the nearest phone, call 911, and leave (after wiping the phone down). Again, I don't trust the law to do the right thing.
We won't mention anything about race, since that'd be derogatory, but I would fell confidant in stating that the race of the victims in all the attacks was NOT that of the tribe that attacked them.
I use the word 'Tribe', since 'Gang' implies at least some command structure, which I
highly doubt this group had.
A 'tribe', though, is:
Quote:
|
Two (2) or more groups that had common hunting grounds or other common attributes such as language.
|
SOURCE
Sounds pretty bang-on to me.
