Don't misunderstand, I'm not being testy. I simply don't concur with the idea that every situation calls for the same answer. It's not as simple as, "is the kid in the line of fire", it's COULD the kid be in the line of fire. In an uncertain and dynamic night situation, it's hard to ascertain what could be behind an intruder, so I assume that the kids ARE. And if the need arises that requires a shot, I feel more comfortable having taken steps to assist their safety. Also, data I have seen indicates penetration in gelatin of around 12 inches for standard BB shot, so I feel comfortable that in 95% of scenarios, it will be effective. As to that last 5%, it's a calculated risk I feel is offset by the added safety from overpenetration.
Again, there's no "round for everything", so why plan like there is?
__________________
"A ship is always referred to as she because it costs so much to keep one in paint and powder."
-ADM Chester Nimitz
ETC(SS) Phil McCrackin
|