View Single Post
Old March 17, 2013, 10:45 AM   #15
AH.74
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 13, 2008
Location: Hermit's Peak
Posts: 623
Quote:
Reported by whom? Source?
Here's a Bloomberg article claiming it was involuntary.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...tml?cmpid=yhoo

Here's an article with some more info, in which the woman claims it was certainly not involuntary.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...s-confiscated/

Quote:
And that's a different question and beyond the scope of this thread. If she disputes being prohibited, she has remedies and needs to pursue them.

But what is material to this thread is that the authorities had taken the position that she is a prohibited person and therefore it was not legal for her to have access to guns, even guns that belong to her husband.
What is also material to this thread is if CA law enforcement authorities are making premature determinations simply based upon hospital records, which may improperly be taking peoples' rights of ownership away- and therefore leading to them engaging in improper confiscation of private property.

Last edited by AH.74; March 17, 2013 at 10:57 AM.
AH.74 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02762 seconds with 8 queries