Originally Posted by Aguila Blanca
but a business owner also has a "moral" obligation (to himself, to any investors in his business, and to his employees) to do what's best for the business.
Just as I have a moral obligation to do what's best for me and my family. If jobs are not available to me and the ones that are are dangerous then my obligation is to do what is best for me.
The rule is immoral because it is allowing a condition to exist that could be remedied at the expense of another. Therefore, the other has no obligation to obey it.