View Single Post
Old October 10, 2013, 02:04 PM   #25
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 193
Compounding things is the fact that apparently he did not register them in CA, either. Not sure how this applies, but the report specifically said they were unregistered. It might be that the particular rifles might have been legal to possess, had they been registered with the state (I rather doubt it, but I don't know).
Registration of those things CA calls 'assault weapons' is currently impossible for non-LEOS. The last registration period ended Jan 1, 2001. (Penal Code 30900)
See the CALGUNS FOUNDATION Wiki for discussion of California firearms law.

The FAQ page is here.
Librarian is offline  
Page generated in 0.03146 seconds with 7 queries