Both parties have speckled histories of behavior.
Your pre-existing view of the case determines that one is better than the other. Let's be frank here.
However, denouncing either based on such vague innuendo isn't really worthwhile.
Also, unless you are telepath of the strength of a second-stage Lensman, you have NO idea how the jury reads a witness. Get real on that.
Last edited by Glenn E. Meyer; July 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM.