View Single Post
Old July 6, 2013, 11:29 PM   #52
hermannr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
And the total of this thread shows why there should be no, none, zero person that are not in custody that should be "prohibited".

To deny any person the right to bear arms in his/her own personal self defense basically states that the prohibited person's life is less valuable than any other person that may bear arms in their own personal self defense. (I do think there is an "equal protection" clause...no?

There were no "prohibited persons" prior to 1968, and it wasn't a problem. That there are persons who probably should not have firearms is not argued, but as everyone here knows and understands, those with criminal intent do not care what restrictions the law may place on them and will obtain their firearms illegally...but they will still obtain them.
hermannr is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04362 seconds with 7 queries