View Single Post
Old May 12, 2013, 09:38 PM   #49
SHE3PDOG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 981
Quote:
However, his innocence is in doubt since apparently his only factor for deciding the officer was another criminal was the tattoos... that's not a reasonable assumption.
Agreed. I find it a bit harsh that some of the other posters relate tattoos to bad guys. They are much more common than they used to be. While I do agree that visible tattoos can still be seen a unprofessional, a lot of military and police, including me, have tattoos. If tattoos and a civilian car are this guys only reason for thinking the cop was another bad guy, he's going to have a tough time in court, and I foresee a change in policy in the near future for the inked cops department.
__________________
Semper Fi

Marine, NRA member, SAF Defender's Club member, and constitutionally protected keeper and bearer of firearms
SHE3PDOG is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04192 seconds with 7 queries