Although the court found Mr. Norman guilty as there was no evidence that the firearm had been concealed before he was arrested or that it could have been due to his manner of dress
I don't think this is a case of a gun-hating prosecutor. But the guilt or innocence of Mr. Norman is secondary to the interesting legal question that the case gives rise to.
I think the OC argument hangs on a technicality because previous law has stated that CC in Florida is a privledge
Maybe CA10 will end up calling CCW a right since Florida is there already.
I can't help but wonder how this jives with Peterson.