View Single Post
Old April 23, 2013, 09:07 AM   #14
Brian Pfleuger
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Central, Southern NY, USA
Posts: 17,463
One would think that banning an entire product line from being imported would certainly be an impermissible burden on interstate commerce.

Interesting that the commerce clause uses that same word from the 2A... "regulate"... which we know from previous discussions didn't mean then what we think it means now....

The word would be more like "to put in good order" than "to control on a level that makes a micro-manager look like a disinterested 3rd party".

Imagine if we read it as:
[The Congress shall have Power] To put in good order Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes.

Hm. "Organize" rather than "dictate".
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
You do not HAVE a soul. You ARE a soul. You HAVE a body.
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Page generated in 0.05044 seconds with 7 queries