Originally Posted by TXAZ
I find it interesting when limits are assumed or placed on an arbitrary scenario. I'm surprised at the number that picked a low number.
Reminds me of mag limits debated.
Joe isn't asking how many firearms people should
want or "be allowed to have."
He's asking how many each of us, personally, would be satisfied with, which is an entirely different question. Not everyone is a "collector." Not everyone has unlimited funds, or storage space. Some put more value on owning a few very high-quality things, while others want as many different things as possible, within the limits of their budgets.
People differ. It's what makes us interesting.
And for most of us, whatever answer we give, the media would still call it an "arsenal"...