View Single Post
Old March 29, 2013, 05:32 PM   #47
Frank Ettin
Staff
 
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 6,515
First, note that 10 USC 311 appears to date back to 1916 and was last amended 20 years ago. A lot has changed in those periods.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gallstones
...This is the very assertion being made, that I not being male, would have no RKBA despite the fact ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gallstones
if we rest solely on the wording of the US Code 10 Chapter 13 I have a problem rebutting the claims....

...What rebuttals have we? Can anyone refer me to any?
The simple answer is that Chapter 13 of Title 10 of the Unites States Code is completely irrelevant to your RKBA. The Supreme Court in Heller ruled that the RKBA was (1) an individual right; and (2) independent of any service in a militia.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper
Frank Ettin is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04135 seconds with 7 queries