View Single Post
Old March 13, 2013, 11:14 AM   #41
JimDandy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,453
Spats, Tom, Al et. al?

Given Al's reading of possessory interest, and the fifth amendment's taking clause, and the exemptions list does it all get enhanced by Pennsylvania Coal Co v Mahon 260 US 393 (1922)

It's legalese to me, being a case from the 20's. Looking at the layman's translation on Wikipedia, the court ruled the difference between a regulation, and a taking, is a fine line shaped by the dimunition of value of the property being regulated. How reduced in value is a 22LR you can't take out to a forest and plink with your kid?
JimDandy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04288 seconds with 7 queries