View Single Post
Old March 7, 2013, 02:20 PM   #28
JimDandy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,344
I'm not as much of an anti-government conspiracy theorist as some, but these things in the hands of DHS make me far less comfortable with the White House position that a military drone strike on US citizens on US soil is unlikely, as the best solution for domestic criminals is law enforcement. I won't really care if the drone doing the striking is DHS or Military...

The older folks will probably remember this joke being used as a reference...
Hmmm... I have two coins in my hand. Together they total 55 cents. One of them is not a nickel, what are they? A 50 cent piece, and a nickel. The 50 cent piece is not a nickel you see.

I have two organizations at my command with Drones.. I find it highly unlikely I would ever order a military drone strike inside the US on US Citizens, "where well-established law enforcement authorities" are the legal choice against US citizens. The military is not a law enforcement authority....
.
.
.

But Homeland Security is, suckers!!!

Last edited by JimDandy; March 7, 2013 at 02:37 PM.
JimDandy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04218 seconds with 7 queries