It's OK here. Interesting link - thanks.
What do I know - maybe Scalia is signaling the antis not to get to carried away with his cautionary notes in the recent decisions?
Personal ties are important - if Kagan moderates her views, that would be nice but it waits for an empirical test.
I would think the pre-emptive mental health gulags, forced reporting and bans from places like NY would not pass constitutional muster.