View Single Post
Old January 31, 2013, 04:17 AM   #46
Bartholomew Roberts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 5,637
Quote:
According to Tresmond and his team, the SAFE Act's registration registration requirement violates the precedent set forth in Haynes v. United States. This was a landslide 7-1 decision from the liberal 1968 Supreme Court, which held that registration requirements are virtually unenforceable for rifles that are already owned by violate the Fifth Amendment's protection against self incrimination.
So what happens when New York adopts the same language change upheld in U.S. vs. Freed, 401 U. S. 601?
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04306 seconds with 7 queries