View Single Post
Old January 29, 2013, 03:16 PM   #35
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 293
Yet they DID change the interpretation in the first passage (because they felt that private machine gun ownership would be too alarming), further reducing the degree of fit between the 1st clause, and the right itself.
Yeah. The intellectual dishonesty is soul-crushing, and I don't see how it has helped us have a "better national discussion"
speedrrracer is offline  
Page generated in 0.06749 seconds with 7 queries