[QUOTE] They have reversed their own opinions several times within the last 10 years on a variety of issues. /QUOTE]
My quote and my apologies for the major typo. I meant within the last 100 years. If interested, you can see some of them here:
But I stand by my comment that the Court members are getting more fast and loose with how they define important textual words in the Constitution. As for defining individual right to bear arms, two of my favorite judges, Scalia and Bork see the definition exactly opposite. Scalia: individual right exists. Bork: individual right exists for national guard members argument and not citizens, blah blah. I've practiced in appellate courts but am sadly disappointed in the Supreme Court because of its politicization.