View Single Post
Old January 26, 2013, 08:23 PM   #2
Luger_carbine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 18, 2012
Posts: 377
Thinly veiled obstacle to ownership.

I think it also reveals the anti-gun attitude, viewpoint and ideology. If my car gets stolen and used in a bank robbery I'm not liable for it. But the antis think that if someone's gun gets stolen there should be someone to sue.

What is the legal principle behind this?

Another way to punish gun owners, just one month at a time - not all at once.
Luger_carbine is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03904 seconds with 7 queries